国产av不卡一区二区_欧美xxxx做受欧美_成年人看的毛片_亚洲第一天堂在线观看_亚洲午夜精品久久久中文影院av_8x8ⅹ国产精品一区二区二区_久久精品国产sm调教网站演员_亚洲av综合色区无码一二三区_成人免费激情视频_国产九九九视频

Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
Opinion
Home / Opinion / Global Lens

New York Times got the Hong Kong fire completely wrong

By Adam Clermont | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2025-12-11 07:15
Share
Share - WeChat
Rescue operations are still underway at a residential area in Tai Po of Hong Kong, Nov 27, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

A recent New York Times article, "After Deadly Fire, Hong Kong Ominously Warns Grieving Citizens to Stay in Line", has circulated widely in Western and local circles. It presents itself as a sober examination of how Beijing uses tragedy as a pretext for control. It is also, quite simply, a story I do not recognize.

The fire at Wang Fuk Court in Tai Po was a genuine catastrophe. The failures that led to this tragedy are specific and concrete. They include weak enforcement of fire-retardant standards on construction netting, poor maintenance of alarms that reportedly never sounded, renovation practices that appear to have emphasized speed and cost savings over safety despite repeated resident complaints dating back more than a year. They involve Hong Kong's own Buildings Department, Fire Services Department, Housing Authority and a network of local contractors and inspectors operating under Hong Kong's own regulations, most of them from the time Hong Kong was still under British rule. There are no secret orders telegraphed from Beijing.

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government's response has also been grounded in local institutions. Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu ordered territory-wide inspections of all public housing estates. The Independent Commission Against Corruption opened an investigation into possible corruption in the refurbishment contracts and has made multiple arrests. The police have launched a criminal inquiry into potential manslaughter by contractors and other responsible parties. These are recognizably the actions of Hong Kong agencies under Hong Kong law: ICAC, the police, the regulatory departments. Whether you consider them sufficient or not, they are clearly focused on accountability, not on silencing grief.

The New York Times article acknowledges some of this but only in passing, as decoration behind its main thesis. It calls it a sequel to a pre-written script about authoritarian reflexes that, the article claims, was seen after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. To sustain that script, it leans heavily on insinuation and carefully curated details, while omitting much of what local readers know immediately.

Consider how the piece presents the university student briefly detained after handing out leaflets calling for an "independent investigation". In the New York Times' telling, this is a purely "natural" response to a terrible disaster. In reality, his leaflet did not emerge spontaneously from raw grief. It was a calculated echo of the 2019 protest slogan "five demands, not one less", repackaged as "four big demands" around this fire: an inquiry, housing guarantees, policy changes, and a familiar rallying cry that every politically aware Hong Kong resident recognizes. He appeared dressed in black, the color that has become a visual shorthand for the 2019 black-clad protesters. The timing, the language, the imagery were crafted to connect this tragedy to that movement.

The same pattern appears in its treatment of the canceled news conference by lawyers, social workers and "policy experts". Readers are told that a news event was planned, an organizer was contacted by the police, and the event was then called off. The implication is left hanging: even measured professionals are now too terrified to speak. Left unsaid is who that lawyer is, what political causes he has publicly championed, which activist networks he has been linked with, and how closely his agenda aligns with those now attempting to turn the Tai Po fire into the next chapter of a long-running political campaign. Those facts do not disqualify him from concern; they simply matter to understanding the situation honestly.

I have learned, by actually living and working here, that Hong Kong is not the grim caricature painted in the Western media. People discuss government policies online and offline in a city with a low homicide rate, better public transport than any US metropolis, and a social safety net that the average US citizen can only dream of. To portray this as a population living in constant terror of speaking is simply untrue.

If the New York Times truly cared about State power and human rights in Hong Kong, it might also remind its readers of something else: what the US government itself has done on this soil. In the years after 9/11, a man transiting through Hong Kong International Airport was seized, handed over to US custody, and rendered to Libya, a country where he was tortured. This was not a theoretical textbook "playbook"; it was an actual kidnapping and rendition carried out with the involvement of US authorities, using Hong Kong as a convenient stage. The same Washington establishment that speaks today through anonymous officials and think tank experts in the pages of the Times has a long record of extraordinary rendition, black sites and torture. The New York Times reported some of this belatedly, but only after years of silence, euphemism or outright deference.

Against that record, the NYT's sudden posture as the moral arbiter of what constitutes "authoritarian" behavior in Hong Kong rings hollow. A newspaper that helped launder the myth of Iraqi "weapons of mass destruction" for a disastrous war; that blurred the line between fact and speculation throughout the Trump-Russia saga; that has repeatedly served as a willing channel for anonymous security-state narratives, is now asking us to treat its interpretation of a Hong Kong fire as holy writ. No thanks.

From my apartment in Hong Kong, I see grieving families at temporary altars, volunteers collecting supplies, neighbors offering spare rooms and meals. I see lawyers arguing over liability, engineers debating building codes, civil servants rushing to check thousands of estates whose facades suddenly look more dangerous than they did the month before. I see a government that makes mistakes, yes, but is clearly focused on finding out what went wrong and preventing it from happening again, not on crushing some imaginary uprising.

As a US solicitor in both Hong Kong and the US, and as a freelance reporter who has publicly defended media freedom here, I want foreign reporting on Hong Kong to be sharp and skeptical. I also want it to be honest enough to let reality disturb a comfortable narrative.

The author, a US citizen, is a practising solicitor admitted in both Hong Kong and the United States, and a freelance reporter based in Hong Kong.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

Most Viewed in 24 Hours
Top
BACK TO THE TOP
English
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
99久久er| 国产成人激情av| 91一区在线| 女仆av观看一区| 豆花视频一区| 日韩经典一区| 妞干网免费在线视频| 欧美成人hd| 飘雪影院手机免费高清版在线观看| 一区二区三区四区在线不卡高清| 日韩av在线免费看| 在线观看91精品国产麻豆| 婷婷久久综合九色综合伊人色| 盗摄精品av一区二区三区| 好吊日精品视频| 久久一本综合| 精品一区不卡| 日韩精品免费一区二区夜夜嗨| 亚洲欧美电影| 97蜜桃久久| 黄色网址在线播放| 中文字幕欧美一区二区| 毛片视频免费| 日韩一区二区精品在线观看| 亚洲91网站| 91在线亚洲| 毛片免费看不卡网站| av影院在线免费观看| 亚洲小说区图片区都市| 老司机免费在线视频| 国产1区2区3区在线| 捆绑紧缚一区二区三区在线观看| 国产激情自拍| 久久精品国产免费观看99| 久久久亚洲成人| 久久99热这里只有精品国产| 日韩亚洲成人av在线| 自拍偷拍免费精品| 亚洲色图第一页| 亚洲人成亚洲人成在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩图片| 日韩成人小视频| 精品美女一区二区三区| 精品对白一区国产伦| 欧美在线播放高清精品| 三年片观看免费观看大全视频下载| 精品视频在线导航| 精品日韩欧美一区二区| 欧美tk丨vk视频| 精品91自产拍在线观看一区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久夜甘婷婷| 一本一本大道香蕉久在线精品| 亚洲人成在线播放网站岛国| 亚洲女性喷水在线观看一区| 韩国成人漫画| 一级片在线观看| 亚洲成人观看| 国产粉嫩一区二区三区在线观看| jizzjizzjizzjizz日本| 欧美另类videos粗暴黑人| 久久亚洲一区二区三区四区五区高| 亚洲精品理论电影| 亚洲欧美国内爽妇网| 国产一区二区三区四区福利| 中文字幕欧美在线| 插插插亚洲综合网| 久久久亚洲精选| 久草视频观看| 麻豆91免费| 天天骑天天干| 最新在线你懂的| 第一视频专区在线| 污视频在线免费观看网站| 国产美女高潮在线观看| a屁视频一区二区三区四区| youjizz亚洲| 9l视频自拍蝌蚪9l视频成人| 免费成人高清在线视频theav| 国产精品久av福利在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区三区| 亚洲激情播播| 亚洲成av人片一区二区密柚| 一本久道综合久久精品| 日韩一级在线| 精品一区二区三区高清免费不卡| 精品欧美乱码久久久久久| 亚洲第一精品夜夜躁人人爽| 中文字幕在线亚洲| 91国内精品久久| 偷窥韩漫第三季| 黄色免费的网站| 性欧美精品孕妇| 超碰中文在线| 调教视频免费在线观看| av中文字幕在线观看第一页| 在线欧美激情| 欧美猛男男男激情videos| 精品黄色一级片| 精品9999| 国产高清久久久久| 中文字幕av一区二区三区免费看| 久久精品在线免费观看| 亚洲国产精品欧美一二99| 欧美日韩国产综合一区二区三区 | 日韩中文在线| 欧美xxxxx视频| 亚洲欧美日韩综合国产aⅴ| 国产一区二区导航在线播放| 国产精品女人毛片| 欧美在线不卡视频| 91精品欧美综合在线观看最新 | 成人动漫在线播放| 卡通欧美亚洲| 欧美韩一区二区| 欧美激情一区| 丁香一区二区三区| 亚洲男人的天堂av| 欧美精品第1页| www.美女亚洲精品| 欧美最猛性xxxxxhd| eeuss网址直达入口| 毛片在线播放网站| 午夜av不卡| 白虎精品一区| 九九精品在线观看| 久久久国产精彩视频美女艺术照福利| 欧美精品在线看| 邪态动恶图27期gif| 中文字幕av高清在线观看| 黄色在线看片| 国产精品白丝av嫩草影院| 日韩黄色大片网站| 麻豆精品一区二区| 亚洲欧美一区二区在线观看| 欧美精品tushy高清| 久久亚洲精品小早川怜子66| 豆国产97在线|亚洲| 日本亚洲欧美| 成人午夜精品| 精品国产午夜| 国产一区二区精品久久| 一区二区三区视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一区二区三区福利 | www.三区| 日本高清在线观看| 国产精品传媒| 日韩激情一二三区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区免费在线电影 | 国产欧美一区二区色老头 | 国产精品久久777777毛茸茸| 久久久www成人免费毛片麻豆| 亚洲午夜电影在线观看| 亚洲精品国产电影| 欧美国产一级| 欧美视频久久| 国产精品素人一区二区| 在线播放日韩导航| 欧美成年人视频| av在线你懂的| 激情av在线播放| 奇米狠狠一区二区三区| 精品一区二区免费视频| 亚洲国产婷婷综合在线精品| 亚洲三级黄色在线观看| 久久久精品久久久久特色影视 | 日韩精品免费一区二区三区竹菊| 欧美 亚欧 日韩视频在线| 成人黄页毛片网站| 欧美最猛性xxxxx直播| 国产视频精品免费播放| 国外成人在线直播| 国产小黄视频| 乱人伦中文视频在线| 精品资源在线| 国产一区二区三区国产| 一本色道综合亚洲| 中文字幕欧美日韩va免费视频| 2019年中文字幕| 尤物网站在线| 精品久久国产一区| 欧美一区二区| 久久青草国产手机看片福利盒子| 偷拍日韩校园综合在线| 日韩视频第一页| 欧美在线影院一区二区| 亚洲三级免费观看| 亚洲毛片在线观看| 日本一二三视频| a级在线观看| 国产精品入口久久| 成人亚洲一区二区一| 欧美日韩一区在线| 亚洲成人偷拍自拍| 在线欧美成人| 日韩国产在线不卡视频| 亚洲欧美日韩国产一区| 亚洲一区二区三区四区在线观看| 欧美美女bb生活片| 久久久国产91| 欧美成人精品福利在线视频| 丁香婷婷在线观看| 亚洲精品国产setv| 成人黄色网址在线观看| 欧美色xxxx| 久久久伊人欧美| 污网站免费在线观看| 一区二区三区四区高清视频| 伊人天天综合| 亚洲福利视频一区| 欧美国产日韩视频| 在线观看高清av| 都市激情亚洲欧美| 国内精品自线一区二区三区视频| 一区二区欧美在线观看| 欧美肥老妇视频| 可以在线观看的黄色| 四虎884aa成人精品最新| 成人性生交大合| 一本色道久久| 久久精品在线免费观看| 亚洲毛片一区二区| 欧美色图中文字幕| 久操免费在线| 久久久久久久久久久9不雅视频| 99麻豆久久久国产精品免费| 精品国产亚洲一区二区三区在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费| 日本天堂在线| 国产影视精品一区二区三区| 久久久久99精品国产片| 一区二区三区四区视频| 国产女优裸体网站| 我要色综合中文字幕| 大桥未久av一区二区三区中文| 欧美视频一二三| 四虎永久网址| 国产丝袜在线播放| 国产日韩欧美一区在线| 色94色欧美sute亚洲13| 九九精品在线视频| 蜜桃视频在线观看网站| 亚洲精选av| 99精品国产视频| 日韩免费一区二区| 九色91蝌蚪| 九七电影院97理论片久久tvb| 日韩天天综合| 欧美日韩一区二区免费在线观看 | 波多野结依一区| 99综合精品| 日韩欧美国产成人| 九九热视频精品在线观看| 成人黄色动漫| 黑人一区二区三区四区五区| 婷婷久久综合九色综合绿巨人| 欧美成人免费在线观看| 3d成人动漫在线| 亚洲黄页一区| 色综合欧美在线| 精品国内一区二区三区免费视频| 麻豆传媒视频在线| 亚洲国产精品一区制服丝袜| 91福利在线免费观看| 国产精品午夜剧场| 日韩不卡免费高清视频| 激情文学综合插| 日韩av网站电影| 最新国产在线| 国产区一区二| 久久一区二区三区四区| 久久久久北条麻妃免费看| yourporn在线观看中文站| 欧美日本久久| 欧美丝袜丝交足nylons| 四虎wwwcom| 三妻四妾的电影电视剧在线观看| 国产欧美欧美| 日韩视频中午一区| 夜夜躁狠狠躁日日躁婷婷小说| 国产v日韩v欧美v| 久久国产精品一区二区| 日韩精品极品在线观看播放免费视频 | 日韩子在线观看| 日韩—二三区免费观看av| 亚洲大胆人体视频| 日韩欧美在线观看一区二区| 亚洲看片一区| 亚洲精品在线电影| 九色在线视频| 玖玖视频精品| 亚洲天堂免费在线| 日韩女优视频免费观看| 成人欧美日韩| 秋霞伦理一区| 成人动漫av在线| 九九热99久久久国产盗摄| 金瓶狂野欧美性猛交xxxx| 国产精品99久久久久| 久热精品在线视频| 国产精品论坛| eeuss影院一区二区三区 | 97高清视频| 小处雏高清一区二区三区| 欧美三区在线观看| 制服黑丝国产在线| 亚洲高清毛片| 日韩精品极品视频| 最后生还者第二季在线观看| 尤物网精品视频| 亚洲精品美女视频| 国产精品精华液网站| 国内精品久久久久久久97牛牛 | 悠悠资源av网站| 99久久婷婷国产综合精品电影√| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费视频 | 再深点灬舒服灬太大了少妇| 日韩综合av| 亚洲女人****多毛耸耸8| 国产福利免费观看| 亚洲天堂日韩在线| 欧美性欧美巨大黑白大战| 美女视频黄是免费| 欧美亚洲激情| 欧美视频在线免费| 免费yellow网站| 欧美另类视频| 亚洲免费福利视频| 精品视频一二区| 久久精品国产亚洲aⅴ| 国产一区91精品张津瑜| 91美女在线观看| 一道精品视频一区二区三区男同 | 精品国产伦一区二区三区观看说明| 日韩欧美二区| 亚洲三级电影全部在线观看高清| 最近免费中文字幕mv视频| 天然素人一区二区视频| 国产精品久久久久影院色老大| 69av成年福利视频| 91大神在线观看线路一区| 一区二区三区在线视频观看58| 一日本道久久久精品国产| 福利在线一区| 欧美色图12p| 国产在线网站| 国产成人一区二区精品非洲| 亚洲成年电人电影网站| 国产色噜噜噜91在线精品| 欧美日韩国产页| 中文在线а天堂av| 奇米888四色在线精品| 欧美激情手机在线视频| 日韩成人18| 欧美日韩精品欧美日韩精品一| 成人av综合一区| 欧美国产日韩在线| 91精品国产黑色瑜伽裤| 国产人久久人人人人爽| 中文字幕三区| 婷婷综合一区| 日韩午夜在线影院| 中文在线观看免费| 国产**成人网毛片九色| 久在线观看福利视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久樱花| 一区二区高清视频在线观看| 日日摸夜夜爽人人添| 午夜精品av| 日韩亚洲欧美中文在线| 久久福利在线| 在线看不卡av| 亚洲s色大片在线观看| 美女免费视频一区| 97一区二区三区| 校园春色亚洲色图| 香蕉成人伊视频在线观看| 传媒av在线| 国产精品88888| 国产乱视频在线观看播放| 欧美色就是色| 国产亚洲欧美日韩一区二区| 成人国产在线| 日本道免费精品一区二区三区| 国产精品精华液网站| 久久一区中文字幕| 国外色69视频在线观看| 任我爽精品视频在线播放| 亚洲成av人乱码色午夜| 精精国产xxxx视频在线野外| 亚洲一区二区三区四区不卡| 一个人看的www一区| 国产成人av资源| 三年片大全在线观看大全有哪些| 久久大综合网| 中文字幕av一区二区| 国产精品欧美一区二区三区不卡| 欧美日韩亚洲视频| 国产在线制服美女| 免费人成在线不卡|